After the ACA Ruling: Next Urgent Steps for Family Medicine
Medscape: What was your initial impression when you learned of the Supreme Court ruling on the ACA?
Dr. Stream: I didn't know what to expect. I had a difficult time separating what I wanted the outcome to be from what I could intellectually predict it would be. I'm pleasantly surprised.
Medscape: Will this ruling change any of the AAFP's expectations about the impact of the ACA on family physicians?
Dr. Stream: I don't believe so. We've been working for over 2 years under a strategy that the ACA was the law of the land, and we wanted to focus on those areas important to family medicine and patients and to make those areas as successful as possible. We also wanted to work on provisions that weren't part of the ACA or were not fully addressed by it, particularly replacing the sustainable growth rate (SGR) formula and achieving meaningful medical liability reform.Having the mandate upheld is consistent with what has been AAFP policy for over 20 years. We have advocated for healthcare coverage for everyone and access to at least basic health services, including good primary care with prevention and chronic illness care. You can argue whether the mandate is the only means to get there, but at least in the analyses that I've seen, it was one of the best identified ways to get everyone covered. Sphere: Related Content
No comments:
Post a Comment